Anyone who knows me knows I have watched more than my share of political coverage during this primary election season. Over the last few weeks, especially, I have had several “ah-ha” moments when listening to Hillary Clinton speak.
I still cannot believe I was such a staunch supporter of hers – EVER!
The media bias is showing more and more. On Anderson Cooper lately, they have had their panels loaded with Hillary and Bernie supporters or Trump haters, with ONE Trump supporter who serves as the equivalent of raw meat thrust into a lion's den.
I know many people are up-in-arms over Mr. Trump's comments regarding Judge Gonzalo Curiel, and while I think his comments could have been worded better, the message is still the same and it's an opinion that I wholeheartedly agree with.
When you have a Judge that has committed to upholding the law, who has repeatedly worked with the anti-white activist group La Raza, and goes on to be part of a panel that awards scholarships to illegal immigrants, there is a problem.
Rather than rewarding illegal immigrants, Judge Gonzalo Curiel should have been upholding the law and should have ordered those illegal immigrants DEPORTED!
How is it that this judge is still able to sit the bench when he clearly disregarded the law?
It’s been said (Megyn Kelly) that Judge Curiel does not have ties with LaRaza – I beg to differ and here’s proof as recent as last month.
and
Now, when you think about the candidates, especially the Democrats and our current president, consider the works of Saul Alinsky. Hillary wrote her college thesis on his writings and Obama has written about him in his own books. Obviously they both have given a great deal of thought to his work.
Saul Alinsky died June 12, 1972 – so his work was obviously a clear glimpse of things to come.
Saul Alinsky’s 12 Rules for Radicals:
RULE 1: “Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have.” Power is derived from 2 main sources – money and people. “Have-Nots” must build power from flesh and blood. (These are two things of which there is a plentiful supply. Government and corporations always have a difficult time appealing to people, and usually do so almost exclusively with economic arguments.)
RULE 2: “Never go outside the expertise of your people.” It results in confusion, fear and retreat. Feeling secure adds to the backbone of anyone. (Organizations under attack wonder why radicals don’t address the “real” issues. This is why. They avoid things with which they have no knowledge.)
RULE 3: “Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy.” Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty. (This happens all the time. Watch how many organizations under attack are blind-sided by seemingly irrelevant arguments that they are then forced to address.)
RULE 4: “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.” If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules. (This is a serious rule. The besieged entity’s very credibility and reputation is at stake, because if activists catch it lying or not living up to its commitments, they can continue to chip away at the damage.)
RULE 5: “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.” There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions. (Pretty crude, rude and mean, huh? They want to create anger and fear.)
RULE 6: “A good tactic is one your people enjoy.” They’ll keep doing it without urging and come back to do more. They’re doing their thing, and will even suggest better ones. (Radical activists, in this sense, are no different that any other human being. We all avoid “un-fun” activities, and but we revel at and enjoy the ones that work and bring results.)
RULE 7: “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.” Don’t become old news. (Even radical activists get bored. So to keep them excited and involved, organizers are constantly coming up with new tactics.)
RULE 8: “Keep the pressure on. Never let up.” Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new. (Attack, attack, attack from all sides, never giving the reeling organization a chance to rest, regroup, recover and re-strategize.)
RULE 9: “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.” Imagination and ego can dream up many more consequences than any activist. (Perception is reality. Large organizations always prepare a worst-case scenario, something that may be furthest from the activists’ minds. The upshot is that the organization will expend enormous time and energy, creating in its own collective mind the direst of conclusions. The possibilities can easily poison the mind and result in demoralization.)
RULE 10: “If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive.” Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog. (Unions used this tactic. Peaceful [albeit loud] demonstrations during the heyday of unions in the early to mid-20th Century incurred management’s wrath, often in the form of violence that eventually brought public sympathy to their side.)
RULE 11: “The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.” Never let the enemy score points because you’re caught without a solution to the problem. (Old saw: If you’re not part of the solution, you’re part of the problem. Activist organizations have an agenda, and their strategy is to hold a place at the table, to be given a forum to wield their power. So, they have to have a compromise solution.)
RULE 12: “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.)
If you do a search on Alinsky and social state, you will find the following list is NOT written by Alinsky himself, but rather from someone who took the Radical Rules and summarized them so people could understand how they might apply to our government and how they are using these rules to create a social state. If you can’t see this happening, you are blind!
Using Radial Rules to Create a Social State – It’s Happening NOW!
The first is the most important.
1) Healthcare — Control healthcare and you control the people
2) Poverty — Increase the Poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live.
3) Debt — Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty.
4) Gun Control — Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state.
5) Welfare — Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Housing, and Income).
6) Education — Take control of what people read and listen to — take control of what children learn in school.
7) Religion — Remove the belief in the God from the Government and schools.
8) Class Warfare — Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to take (Tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor.
Given that Hillary speaks often about equality in one breath, while glorifying the segregation of people into micro-groups is very telling of the Democrat’s intentions. Equality is NOT the goal here people – segregation into smaller groups of diversity is the goal. Smaller groups of passionate people are SO MUCH easier to control. Whether the groups are based on age, race, religion, heritage, gender, or sexual preference – smaller groups are EASY to control and manipulate.
Don’t you agree? Please, leave your comments and let me know your thoughts. I’d love to hear from you!
